Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

WiKirby:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
{{Oppose}}
{{Oppose}}
#The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
#The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. {{User:Superbound/sig}} 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
#For the time being, I agree with Superbound. The beginning paragraph needs to be extended before we feature it. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Neutral}}
{{Neutral}}



Revision as of 21:37, 17 November 2020


Current Nominations

Popstar (November 4, 2020 - November 18, 2020)

A good, fairly long page about an important location to the series. Need I say more? ---PinkYoshiFan 23:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Support
  1. Seems like it fits the bill. I don't really see anything important missing from the article, and it's got a healthy-sized gallery to boot. --Samwell (talk) 03:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Oppose
  1. The article is good, but the opening abstract is too short. I will gladly change my vote if it's fixed. Superbound (talk) 13:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  2. For the time being, I agree with Superbound. The beginning paragraph needs to be extended before we feature it. -- Jellytost (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Neutral

Nomination Archive

Featured Articles
Failed Nominations