Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
File talk:KMA Stactus artwork 2.png: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) (→Feet) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why does the "larger" upload have feet, when the smaller image does not? Are these two separate versions of the artwork, or was the smaller one edited to remove the feet? As far as I'm aware, the enemy has no feet in the game, so the fact that there is art of it with feet seems rather odd to me.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] ([[User talk:Vellidragon|talk]]) 22:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC) | Why does the "larger" upload have feet, when the smaller image does not? Are these two separate versions of the artwork, or was the smaller one edited to remove the feet? As far as I'm aware, the enemy has no feet in the game, so the fact that there is art of it with feet seems rather odd to me.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] ([[User talk:Vellidragon|talk]]) 22:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
:I looked around a bit, and from what I can tell, this feet-sporting version comes from a press kit, and is not used as the final version of the artwork. The original version of this file without feet likely comes from the Japanese 20th anniversary artbook, but someone will have to go recapture that, since the original version we had came from FANDOM, which never sources its files, so we can't be sure. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 23:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) | :I looked around a bit, and from what I can tell, this feet-sporting version comes from a press kit, and is not used as the final version of the artwork. The original version of this file without feet likely comes from the Japanese 20th anniversary artbook, but someone will have to go recapture that, since the original version we had came from FANDOM, which never sources its files, so we can't be sure. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 23:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
::Sounds like it could be an earlier design. The version without feet should probably be the main image for the enemy, and this press kit art can be placed elsewhere with context of where it came from. The small image seems sourced from the same one I uploaded way back when I made the original Kakusan article, but it looks like both that uploaded image and article are gone (they were probably lost in one of the many database losses the site was suffering back then). Given that I had it, the scan probably came from Rainbow Resort (we never took images from the wikia as a rule).--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] ([[User talk:Vellidragon|talk]]) 23:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:46, 6 December 2021
Feet
Why does the "larger" upload have feet, when the smaller image does not? Are these two separate versions of the artwork, or was the smaller one edited to remove the feet? As far as I'm aware, the enemy has no feet in the game, so the fact that there is art of it with feet seems rather odd to me.--Vellidragon (talk) 22:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- I looked around a bit, and from what I can tell, this feet-sporting version comes from a press kit, and is not used as the final version of the artwork. The original version of this file without feet likely comes from the Japanese 20th anniversary artbook, but someone will have to go recapture that, since the original version we had came from FANDOM, which never sources its files, so we can't be sure. --Samwell (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sounds like it could be an earlier design. The version without feet should probably be the main image for the enemy, and this press kit art can be placed elsewhere with context of where it came from. The small image seems sourced from the same one I uploaded way back when I made the original Kakusan article, but it looks like both that uploaded image and article are gone (they were probably lost in one of the many database losses the site was suffering back then). Given that I had it, the scan probably came from Rainbow Resort (we never took images from the wikia as a rule).--Vellidragon (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
