Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

WiKirby:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
#Looks featured to me. Samwell made a lot of improvements to this article, so there should be no reason to not let this article be featured. --[[User:pandakekok9|pandakekok9]] ([[User talk:pandakekok9|poyo]]) 07:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
#Looks featured to me. Samwell made a lot of improvements to this article, so there should be no reason to not let this article be featured. --[[User:pandakekok9|pandakekok9]] ([[User talk:pandakekok9|poyo]]) 07:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
#Poyo! (Kirby must be featured. He has been a good boy.) {{User:Kirb/sig}} 15:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
#Poyo! (Kirby must be featured. He has been a good boy.) {{User:Kirb/sig}} 15:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
#Now that the proper improvements have been made to the article, it should be good to go this time around. Support per this and my previously stated reasons: "The article is very well-written, and has a mighty gallery to go along with it." -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 01:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}
{{Oppose}}
{{Neutral}}
{{Neutral}}

Revision as of 01:05, 27 March 2021


Current Nominations

Kirby (anime character) (March 21, 2021 - April 4, 2021)

My complaints from last nomination has been fixed and this article looks good, sooooo... Superbound (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Support
  1. If Kirby is Good, we must feature him. More Kirby. ---PinkYoshiFan 13:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
  2. Looks featured to me. Samwell made a lot of improvements to this article, so there should be no reason to not let this article be featured. --pandakekok9 (poyo) 07:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
  3. Poyo! (Kirby must be featured. He has been a good boy.) --kirb 15:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
  4. Now that the proper improvements have been made to the article, it should be good to go this time around. Support per this and my previously stated reasons: "The article is very well-written, and has a mighty gallery to go along with it." -- Jellytost (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral

Nomination Archive

Featured Articles
Failed Nominations