Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.

WiKirby:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
(v o t e)
Line 12: Line 12:
#I think this article could be worked on a little more before it gets featured. It has lots of work to be done. {{User:GameDoor64/sig}}
#I think this article could be worked on a little more before it gets featured. It has lots of work to be done. {{User:GameDoor64/sig}}
#I'm mostly with Superbound here. The opening is too short (not ''waaaaaay'' too short, just too short). Not only are Star Stacker screenshots needed, but the section on it needs to be expanded. The KBR gif is a less important thing, but it's still notable; I had to see it a few times before noticing the picture of Kawasaki in the bottom right. I think a cropped screenshot that focuses on the picture would work better. Overall, this article has great potential, it just needs some fixing. {{User:Obsessive Mario Fan/sig}} 20:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
#I'm mostly with Superbound here. The opening is too short (not ''waaaaaay'' too short, just too short). Not only are Star Stacker screenshots needed, but the section on it needs to be expanded. The KBR gif is a less important thing, but it's still notable; I had to see it a few times before noticing the picture of Kawasaki in the bottom right. I think a cropped screenshot that focuses on the picture would work better. Overall, this article has great potential, it just needs some fixing. {{User:Obsessive Mario Fan/sig}} 20:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
#I agree with the above. It has potential, but needs more work - such as the tasks listed above - done to it first before it gets the spotlight, I think. -- {{User:MetaDragon/sig}} 07:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
{{Neutral}}
{{Neutral}}


Revision as of 07:53, 14 May 2021


Featured Article Nomination
What a Featured Article is:
  1. An article marked as "Good".
  2. An article with an official (non-conjectural) name (more details on the naming policy page).
  3. An article with an opening abstract of sufficient length, preferably consisting of at least two paragraphs.
  4. An article with proper documentation. (no substantial info is missing)
  5. Sound of format. (no improvement notice templates are present)
  6. Sufficient overall length. (at least 5000 bytes long)
  7. Not a list page, disambiguation page, or subpage.
  8. Properly categorized.
  9. Not an orphaned page. (at least one article links to it)
Voting Regulations
  1. Voting is currently open to all registered users.
  2. All votes must be signed with signatures (type four tildes (~~~~.)) Unsigned votes are automatically negated, regardless of any points made.
  3. An article will become automatically featured if it receives five (5) valid votes to support it and two (2) days have passed since the nomination.
  4. After two (2) weeks of being nominated, an article will be featured if it does not have more opposition than support. (this means a tie or zero votes will still result in a feature)
  5. An article will fail to become featured if it receives five (5) valid oppositions.
  6. There may be no more than six (6) nominated articles at one time. Do not add any more than this.
  7. The editor who puts the article up for nomination may not vote on it.
  8. Please add all oppositions/supports on a new line beginning with a number/pound/hash sign (#) to automatically create an alphanumeric list.
  9. All votes with comments perceived by the staff as hostile or rude to another user will be removed. Be civil and polite.
  10. Staff members reserve the right to negate any votes without notification of the voter if they are found to be in violation of any of these rules or if suspected of trolling.
Nomination Cooldown
Once an article has attained featured status, a total of thirty (30) days must pass before it can be nominated for unfeaturement.

Current Nominations

Chef Kawasaki (May 8th-May 22nd, 2021)

A lengthy article about a great midboss. Who's with me? Kawasaki'sBiggestFan (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Support
Oppose
  1. First, the article's opening is waaaaaay too short, it shouldn't have been even nominated in state like this. Second, it needs images from Star Stacker, one or two screenshots should be good enough. Three, it currently uses highly dynamic gif (that shows the audience for less that a second of it) to showcase his appearance in KBR. I tried hard and didn't couldn't see anything. Additionally, the article is just lacking to be featured - it's good, but not great enough to be on the main page. I'll be happy to change my vote once all of this gets fixed. Superbound (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  2. I think this article could be worked on a little more before it gets featured. It has lots of work to be done. - GameDoor64 (talk) (edits)
  3. I'm mostly with Superbound here. The opening is too short (not waaaaaay too short, just too short). Not only are Star Stacker screenshots needed, but the section on it needs to be expanded. The KBR gif is a less important thing, but it's still notable; I had to see it a few times before noticing the picture of Kawasaki in the bottom right. I think a cropped screenshot that focuses on the picture would work better. Overall, this article has great potential, it just needs some fixing. --DeepFriedCabbage 20:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  4. I agree with the above. It has potential, but needs more work - such as the tasks listed above - done to it first before it gets the spotlight, I think. -- Jellytost♡ (talk) 07:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Neutral

Nomination Archive

Featured Articles
Failed Nominations

Retrieved from "https://wikirby.com/w/index.php?title=WiKirby:Featured_Article_Nomination&oldid=226878"