From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
|
|
| (30 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. -->__NOTOC__{{FARules}} | | <!-- This prevents the Table of Contents from showing up. -->__NOTOC__{{FARules}} |
|
| |
|
| = '''Current Nominations''' = | | = '''Current Nominations'''= |
| == '''''[[Kirby's Return to Dream Land Deluxe]]''''' (March 21, 2023 - April 4, 2023) ==
| | ''None at the moment.'' |
| | |
| This is probably one of the few Kirby games that aren't featured yet. Also, great quality. [[User:Darienow|Darienow]] ([[User talk:Darienow|talk]]) 19:05, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| {{Support}}
| |
| #Kirby's Return to Dream Land Deluxe is the BEST REMAKE EVER! 100/100 [[User:AGUSTÍN HERNÁNDEZ RIVAS|AGUSTÍN HERNÁNDEZ RIVAS]] 23:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| #Every Kirby game with a good page deserves to be featured. {{User:Pinkyoshifan/sig}} 15:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| #I took great pains to make this page deserving of Good, so it's not that much of a leap to get it featured as well. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 17:32, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| #Meets requirements, looks like a great game, what else is there even to say? [[User:ShadowKirby|ShadowKirby]] ([[User talk:ShadowKirby|talk]]) 13:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| #I constantly ramble about this game especially when it's the first time HAL has made Return to Dream Land accessible to a ''Kirby'' fan who has gotten into the series starting with Triple Deluxe. This game's still great to me, and the article is great as well, with lots of information to back this up. Let's do it! [[User:EleCyon|EleCyon]] ([[User talk:EleCyon|talk]]) 13:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
| |
| {{Oppose}}
| |
| | |
| {{Neutral}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == '''Nomination Archive''' == | | == '''Nomination Archive''' == |
Revision as of 00:06, 9 March 2024
Featured Article Nomination
|
What a Featured Article is:
|
- An article marked as "Good".
- An article with an official (non-conjectural) name (more details on the naming policy page).
- An article with an opening abstract of sufficient length, preferably consisting of at least two paragraphs.
- An article with proper documentation. (no substantial info is missing)
- Sound of format. (no improvement notice templates are present)
- Sufficient overall length. (at least 5000 bytes long)
- Not a list page, disambiguation page, or subpage.
- Properly categorized.
- Not an orphaned page. (at least one article links to it)
|
Voting Regulations
|
- Voting is currently open to all registered users.
- All votes must be signed with signatures (type four tildes (~~~~.)) Unsigned votes are automatically negated, regardless of any points made.
- An article will become automatically featured if it receives five (5) valid votes to support it and two (2) days have passed since the nomination.
- After two (2) weeks of being nominated, an article will be featured if it does not have more opposition than support. (this means a tie or zero votes will still result in a feature)
- An article will fail to become featured if it receives five (5) valid oppositions.
- There may be no more than six (6) nominated articles at one time. Do not add any more than this.
- The editor who puts the article up for nomination may not vote on it.
- Please add all oppositions/supports on a new line beginning with a number/pound/hash sign (#) to automatically create an alphanumeric list.
- All votes with comments perceived by the staff as hostile or rude to another user will be removed. Be civil and polite.
- Staff members reserve the right to negate any votes without notification of the voter if they are found to be in violation of any of these rules or if suspected of trolling.
|
Nomination Cooldown
|
Once an article has attained featured status, a total of thirty (30) days must pass before it can be nominated for unfeaturement.
|
Current Nominations
None at the moment.
Nomination Archive
Featured Articles
Failed Nominations
