Automoderated users, autopatrol
148,680
edits
Please remember that WiKirby contains spoilers, which you read at your own risk! See our general disclaimer for details.
Talk:The Wondaria Dream Parade: Difference between revisions
From WiKirby, your independent source of Kirby knowledge.
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
Luigifan18 (talk | contribs) m (→Dispute) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Luigifan18, if you don't comment on anything else from your side of things in the next few days, I will consider this particular point solved, and that both uses are correct and shouldn't be changed one way or another. But if you have more to comment, please do. {{User:Gigi/sig}} 13:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | Luigifan18, if you don't comment on anything else from your side of things in the next few days, I will consider this particular point solved, and that both uses are correct and shouldn't be changed one way or another. But if you have more to comment, please do. {{User:Gigi/sig}} 13:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I still stand by what I said about two words with nothing but a hyphen, en dash, or em dash between them appearing to be conjoined into one word-unit, whether they're supposed to be or not, which can make reading such sentences awkward. (See, for instance, RationalWiki's page on the [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger effect], where (as of this writing) "Dunning" and "Kruger" are conjoined by what looks like but isn't quite a hyphen, making internal links to that page somewhat awkward. I always end up tripping the redirect. Regardless, in the context of "Dunning-Kruger" effect, "Dunning" and "Kruger" are meant to be conjoined, so the use of any hyphen variant with no spaces between them makes sense.) --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 15:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | :I still stand by what I said about two words with nothing but a hyphen, en dash, or em dash between them appearing to be conjoined into one word-unit, whether they're supposed to be or not, which can make reading such sentences awkward. (See, for instance, RationalWiki's page on the [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect Dunning-Kruger effect], where (as of this writing) "Dunning" and "Kruger" are conjoined by what looks like but isn't quite a hyphen, making internal links to that page somewhat awkward. I always end up tripping the redirect. Regardless, in the context of "Dunning-Kruger" effect, "Dunning" and "Kruger" are meant to be conjoined, so the use of any hyphen variant with no spaces between them makes sense.) --[[User:Luigifan18|Luigifan18]] ([[User talk:Luigifan18|talk]]) 15:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Hmm, I don't think that example works, because despite what you've claimed, that article does indeed use a hyphen to join the names together on the page itself. You can confirm this by copying and pasting the hyphen. While the links you've mentioned do use a special character ( – ) this is still not the same thing as an em dash, which is much longer ( — ). I hope this makes sense. --[[User:Samwell|Samwell]] ([[User talk:Samwell|talk]]) 15:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
